<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fixing everything, really slowly &#187; vmware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peter-jenkins.com/tag/vmware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peter-jenkins.com</link>
	<description>Personal Blog of Peter Jenkins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:07:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Thin client server side power consumption</title>
		<link>http://peter-jenkins.com/2010/03/01/thin-client-server-side-power-consumption/</link>
		<comments>http://peter-jenkins.com/2010/03/01/thin-client-server-side-power-consumption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Jenkins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thinclient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xenserver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter-jenkins.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I sometimes get asked about energy savings from thin clients. It&#8217;s fairly straightforward to work out the energy consumption of the clients, but it&#8217;s harder know how how much power to budget for on the server side. Without specific requirements it really is a case of &#8220;it depends&#8221;. While reading the excelent Virtual Reality Check &#8211; Phase [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sometimes get asked about energy savings from thin clients. It&#8217;s fairly straightforward to work out the energy consumption of the clients, but it&#8217;s harder know how how much power to budget for on the server side. Without specific requirements it really is a case of &#8220;it depends&#8221;.</p>
<p>While reading the excelent <a href="http://www.projectvrc.nl/index.php?option=com_docman&amp;task=doc_details&amp;gid=9&amp;Itemid=">Virtual Reality Check &#8211; Phase II</a> (via <a href="http://www.virtualization.info/2010/02/benchmarks-vsphere-40-vs-xenserver-55.html">Virtualization.info</a>) I was amazed that they didn&#8217;t even mention power consumption. Their tests showed that you could support between 80 and 165 user sessions from the test hardware (an HPDL380G6). I was interested to find out how much power this server uses, the answer (after way too long with HP&#8217;s Windows only, yet HTML, and Flash based <a href="http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/power-advisor/index.html">Power Advisor</a>) is about 410Watts, that&#8217;s between 5 and 2.5 Watts per user. Not bad!</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;d be the first to say that this hardware setup isn&#8217;t wat you&#8217;d use (or all that you&#8217;d need) in a thin client deployment of this size, but still it&#8217;s an impressive number. As the Virtual Reality Check report says the improvements in the last year are almost entirely due to CPU improvements from Intel. Nehalem certainly is quick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peter-jenkins.com/2010/03/01/thin-client-server-side-power-consumption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
